Categories
In many programs and organizations, a startup is reviewed by more than one person. This changes how evaluation works, because consistency becomes a core requirement.
Why multiple reviewers are used
- to reduce individual bias
- to scale review volume
- to compare perspectives across domains
What happens when reviewers disagree
Disagreement often comes from different interpretations of unclear inputs. When materials are ambiguous, reviewers fill gaps differently, producing inconsistent scores or notes.
How founders can reduce variance
- use consistent language across deck and application
- define the user and problem precisely
- avoid broad claims without context